Multimodal Transmediation to Strengthen Analytical Writing in the Online Classroom

manga image of girl sipping coffee

Amanda Torres
Lecturer, English

Checklist for Online Lesson

The shift to remote learning incited by the COVID-19 pandemic asked instructors to radically reconsider our pedagogicalpractices for an online space. This move was met with valid worries and hesitation about what would be lost from theclassroom learning experience with less emphasis on what would be gained from the digital learning experience. Fortunately,one of the many affordances of online learning is the ability to incorporate multimodality for projects and classwork.Multimodal assignments integrate different modes of activity, encouraging students to participate and engage with materialmore deeply. For writing and literature instructors, specifically, multimodality can introduce new practices for close readingand text-based analysis enabled through collaborative production of visual media online. Transmediation, or applying“understanding from one sign system and moving it into another in order to generate meaning” (qtd. in Batchelor 69) can be an especially generative practice to facilitate close reading, collaboration, analysis, brainstorming, and revision.

As transmediating is a process of deriving meaning through creation, it is a flexible practice that invites creation of allkinds of media from comics to podcasts to video essays. One of the most approachable modes of transmediating in anonline classroom involves asking students to draw, whether multi-paneled comics or simple sketches. Although students might be hesitant about their art skills, it is not necessary for one to be a gifted artist to perform transmediation. Thispractice also does not require a technological familiarity with any external programs or applications as it is possible to drawon the whiteboards of many video conferencing apps, such as Zoom or Blackboard Collaborate. It would be easiest to drawon the whiteboard with a touch screen-enabled device, but it can also be done with a mouse. If the whiteboard seems toolimited for art that is more involved than a sketch, such as a 4-panel comic, there are websites like Pixton that only requireregistration with an account. Pixton is a comic and storyboard creator for educators, and it provides a variety of presetbackgrounds, characters, comic sound effects, and other art assets for students to choose from to put a comic together instead of drawing one.

What matters more than the aesthetics of student-generated art is the process of play and discovery that happens throughdrawing. Drawing comics, whether individually or collaboratively, is a particularly well-suited practice for exploration of atext or abstract ideas. For instance, in her essay, “Illustrating Praxis: Comic Composition, Narrative Rhetoric, and CriticalMultiliteracies,” Kathryn Comer explains how drawing and creating comics invited her students to consider how narrativesare constructed and how to make mindful, structural choices in revision. Furthermore, comics “rely on more than justlinguistic and visual modes of communication; they combine words and images with gestural, spatial, and even audiomodes into a truly multimodal experience” (Comer 76). This means that all students can participate in the creation of acomic, including students who are visually impaired or students who do not have the technological requirements to access ashared whiteboard. In a journal titled “Digital Transmediation and Revision”, Katherine Batchelor regards the playfulnessof drawing as a mode of inquiry, which “recognizes that deeper understanding can be obtained by students’ self-drivenunderstanding through multiple ways of knowing. Through these instances of inquiry, students are better able to inquire about themselves as writers, ways in which they want to think about revising, and more importantly, how they want to position themselves during semiotic acts of transmediating” (72). Therefore, writing and literature instructors can employ transmediation inmultiple contexts in online learning, such as:

  • asking students to transmediate a complex literary or nonfiction passage into a digital whiteboard sketch andthen having them compare their sketches in
    • Reflection prompt: How did they “see” the passage differently?
  • asking students to collaboratively transmediate a passage into a multi-paneled This encourages students tonot only consider drawing the main “action” of the passage, but to also consider how their diverseinterpretations of the text inform the comic’s setting, background, characters (or lack of characters), facialexpressions, body language, captions, speech bubbles, onomatopoeic sound effects, and narrative pacing. Consequently, students are implicitly being tasked with discussing and deconstructing the text together.
    • Reflection prompt: How did a writer’s rhetorical and literary choices impact their artistic choices?
  • asking students to transmediate a creative writing piece into a drawing, comic, collage, presentation, or video.
    • Reflection prompt: What did they observe about their writing and its narrative choices or structure through the process of transmediating it into another medium?
  • asking students to transmediate a peer’s writing (whether it is creative writing, an analytical essay, or an argumentative essay, etc) into a drawing, comic, collage, infographic, wordmap, cluster word web, or presentation
    • Reflection prompts for the student writer: What aspects of their writing/ideas were emphasized the most through transmediation by their peers? What does this reveal about how their audience “sees” theirwriting and main ideas? Did they “see” something that the original writer did not?
    • Reflection prompts for the peer reviewer: how did your peer’s rhetorical, analytical, or structural choicesimpact your creative choices? What did they perceive as the writer’s main ideas or the main threads oftheir argument? What did they want to “see” more of in their peer’s writing?

Activities like these can facilitate online collaborative writing with the goal of deepening close reading and analysis. Moreover, asking students to collaborate on transmediating their assigned reading or their own writing creates a culture of mindful peer review and an enhanced approach to revision. Since writing is a means of discovery, transmediation fosters a sense of play and creativity within the writing process, as Batchelor demonstrates in her essay. Although Batchelor’s experience is in teaching middle school students, her proposals apply to college students, as well – especially first-year writing students. Many first-year writing students enter English 110 and English 130 with the assumption that “the first draft is the final draft”; they are therefore reluctant to engage in a slowed-down writing process that involves planning, outlining, drafting, and revising. Subsequently, transmediation (in both online learning and in-person learning) presents an opportunity to incorporate multimodality throughout the entire writing process, which can help to recontextualize revision as a playful and creative form of discovery rather than a tedious chore. Ultimately, transmediation invites students (and instructors!) to reimagine the processes that go into crafting writing and the active engagement necessary to motivate students to be readers and writers with agency.

Annotated Bibliography

  • Batchelor, Katherine. “Digital Transmediation and Revision.” Voices from the Middle, vol. 23, no. 2, 2015,library.ncte.org/journals/VM/issues/v23-2/27621. Accessed 17 June 2022.
    In this article, literacy professor Katherine Batchelor establishes how transmediation or “understanding from one signsystem and moving it into another in order to generate meaning” is a constructive process for revision (69).Transmediation allows students to “re-see” their writing, whether it is analytical or creative. The process oftransmediating a work of writing into another modality (comic, slideshow, animation, video, etc) invites deeper revisionand a sense of play as a mode of inquiry. Batchelor describes how a transmediation project worked out in a middle school class to create science fiction short stories, but the core practices of her project could easily work for college-level writingin an online setting. She even suggests online tools for multimodality, such as iMovie, Glogster, Pixton Comics, Animoto,GoAnimate, and Prezi.
  • Comer, Kathryn. “Illustrating Praxis: Comic Composition, Narrative Rhetoric, and Critical Multiliteracies.” Composition Studies, vol. 43, no. 1, 2015, pp. 75–104. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43501879. Accessed 17 June 2022.
    In this article, composition professor Kathryn Comer investigates the affordances of composing comics and graphicmemoirs as pedagogical tools for “rhetorical experimentation and multimodal literacy development” (75). She argues howcomics present a unique opportunity to place several different modes of communication in conversation. Likewise, thecreation of comics asks students to carefully consider their rhetorical awareness of narrative and audience. She providesexamples of how comic composition succeeded in her graphic memoir class, which invited students to reflect on theirexperiences as comic readers and comic writers. Moreover, producing multimodal texts like comics required students totreat revision with more attention as they were more aware of how their narratives needed to be constructed for themedium. Comer reports how incorporating the comic assignment increased student attendance and participation andcreated more opportunities for workshops and peer revision. This source is both theoretically and pedagogically useful for instructors. The practice of composing comics can translate very well to online learning, where students can either usedigital whiteboard functions to draw comic panels (regardless of personal drawing ability) or upload photos with comic-like captions, as Comer shows.
  • Laksimi Morrow, Sakina. “Collaging Point of View.” Visible Pedagogy, vp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/01/27/collaging-point-of-view/. Accessed 17 June 2022.
    In this blog post, urban education doctoral candidate Sakina Laksimi Morrow describes a collage project that took place inher pedagogy workshop. She explains how collages “[ask] for an interplay between intuition and thought – reconstructingnew meanings, finding other meanings from the raw material” (Laksimi Morrow). Multimedia digital collages can be incorporated into online learning for students to createmeaning from difficult texts or to discover new meanings within their own writing.
  • Losh, Elizabeth, et al. “Rethinking Revision.” Understanding Rhetoric: A Graphic Guide to Writing, Bedford/St.Martin’s, 2014, 217 – 244.
    In this chapter, writing instructors Elizabeth Losh and Jonathan Alexander explore why revision is necessary in writingand how to do it effectively. Losh and Alexander address a common misconception about revision and explain itsdifferences from editing sentence-level errors. Their definition of revision is grounded in breaking down the word itself:“re-vision: it’s about seeing a composition anew, with fresh eyes – seeing your own work as if you were another reader.It’s about considering possibilities as well as problems” (219). To support this claim, Losh and Alexander providemethods of radical revision and examples of famous pieces of writing that were revised for the better. Since this chapteris a comic from a larger graphic guide, it serves as an example of a multimodal text in addition to presenting a necessarycase for the significance of revision and peer review in the writing process. It can be a valuable source for bothinstructors and students to navigate the conversation around essay revision and multimodal projects (like creating a comic).Losh and Alexander are essentially making a case for transmediation, similar to Katherine Batchelor.
  • Reimagining First-Year Writing at the University of Connecticut. U Conn, Sept 2018, express.adobe.com/page/bR1G4L0VYEufK/. Accessed 17 June 2022.
    The First Year Writing program at the University of Connecticut spearheaded an initiative called Writing AcrossTechnology (WAT) in 2018. This department website outlines how WAT will inform the FYW program, primarily througha stronger emphasis on multimodality in writing classes. The goal of the WAT initiative is to “ask students to composemultimodally, exploring linguistic, aural, visual, gestural, and spatial modes of meaning-making.” To achieve thisgoal, the website provides a sketch of the kinds of meaning-making moves that should be scaffolded into FYW courses,including collecting and curating, engaging and entering a conversation, contextualizing, theorizing, and circulating. The site also shares a detailed list of learning objectives and resources for instructors such as a course planning tool and toolsfor technology and engagement. Instructors will benefit from this source’s concrete and accessible approach to multimodal learning. Multimodality can flourish in the online classroom where it can be implemented in all steps of thelearning and writing process.
  • Shaw, Gwen. “Triple-Entry Journals: Engagement and Reflexivity.” Visible Pedagogy, vp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2017/03/28/my-triple-entry-journal-assignment-engagement-and- reflexivity/. Accessed17 June 2022.
    In this blog post, art history doctoral candidate Gwen Shaw describes an assignment she designed called the “triple entryjournal,” which asks students to sketch a work of art. After sketching, students are asked to freewrite formal analysis of the piece, paying particular attention to the artist’s choices, especially those that stood out to the students as they were sketching.Lastly, students reflect on the insights they developed through sketching and analyzing to derive meaning from the work of art. This activity can be completed online for composition assignments that require visual analysis or for close reading assignments that could ask students to sketch what is happening in a literary passage.
  • Teaching Multimodal Composition. Sweetland Center for Writing at U of Mich, lsa.umich.edu/sweetland/instructors/teaching-resources/teaching-multimodal-composition. html. Accessed 17 June 2022.
    This guide from the University of Michigan’s Center for Writing outlines resources and pedagogical practices for teachingmultimodal composition. It provides a basic framework for structuring multimodal projects in the compositionclassroom and tangible advice for achieving pedagogical goals. The practices listed in this guide can serve instructors inan online class with their easily adaptable suggestions for producing multimodal texts.

Q: What would help?!

We’re all juggling so much this semester: As we’re learning all these new platforms, we’re finding new ways to use them to advance the pedagogical goals we bring to our classes, now and forever.

And then there is the fire that’s raining from the sky on so many fronts.

The English Department knows that these stresses fall disproportionately on our part-time colleagues, and we want to diminish that effect however we can. First Year Writing has some ideas about how to do that, as you’d expect.

We’re also wary of inviting you to more workshops and things when you already have so much to do.

So we want to hear from you. What would help?

As you ponder this question, it might be useful to know, too, the the department has a new committee on online teaching, and First Year Writing will be in touch with its members as they set their agenda for the semester. We want to foster a department-wide discussion that will prove beneficial to part-time faculty.

What would you like to discuss, and how would you like to discuss it? What resources could the department provide to support you through this @%@#*! time?

Here are some things we’ve discussed:

  • Set up discussion boards for all of the various platforms (Google Classroom, Blackboard, Academic Commons, Zoom, Slack, etc.) where faculty could go to share ideas and ask/answer questions.
  • Make more use of this site as an asynchronous discussion board to talk about whatever’s on your mind.
  • Hold office hours to meet with you synchronously about whatever’s on your mind.
  • Organize workshops (which could be synchronous or asynchronous) with faculty who have expertise in one or more of the platforms.

Which of these ideas appeal to you, if any– and what other ideas should we consider?

You have also have just the germ of an idea, and we’re interested to hear that, too. That is, you may know you want something without knowing quite what it is that want. In that case, you might also use the space below to describe the kind of support you’d like to have, and we can try to figure out how to provide it.

We are in solidarity with you, and we’re eager to hear what you think, Please tell us in the comments below!

 

New resources for teaching online!

A zoom screen on a laptop with a coffee cup next to it

We’re working on a lot of materials to support our collective transition to teaching fully online. Some are up now, and others will appear in these locations in the days to come:

  • The Disability Guide, which includes a page of resources for making sure your online classes will be accessible to students with disabilities (up now);
  • A modified assignment sequence, proposing some ways that you might adapt the scaffolding of your writing/reading assignments for teaching online– though you’re also free to stick with your usual syllabus if you prefer, obviously (up now);
  • Low-stakes assignments tailored to teaching online, with videos that explain how they’re scaffolded to support the writing assignments (up now, with more to come);
  • Shell versions of the ENG 110 syllabi in Google Classroom, Blackboard, and Academic Commons (which works exactly like QWriting but has more resources behind it), along with short videos that explain how each syllabus is set up digitally (these will be up by August 1);
  • Examples of how to organize synchronous and asynchronous work, posted in lesson plans (up now, with more to come);
  • Advice about specific technologies to use to teach writing online, with examples of how to use them (posted in the FAQ under resources); and
  • More resources! Posted, obviously, under resources.

We know it’s a lot to think about! And we know also that it’s a lot to prepare, especially while we’re all challenged and distracted in so many news ways at once.

But we know also that this will be true for our students, too. They may come to us in the fall with needs that are even greater than usual– because they’re living through a pandemic as they’re also adjusting to this remote learning environment and learning as they always do how to thrive in college.

We want to make it work for them and for you as well as we can.

Watch this space!

Online Library Workshops for Spring 2020

Dear Colleague,

I hope this email finds you well in this stressful time! As promised, we have created a LibGuide for library instruction for English 110: https://qc-cuny.libguides.com/english110. This will also be linked as an announcement on our English 110 website for instructors. (This guide might also be helpful for teaching/reviewing research in other courses.)

The guide includes videos (with transcripts), detailed text-based guidance, three short research exercises tied to the learning objectives for each topic, and a chat box on every page that students can use to connect with a librarian. During the time of the instruction session as it was originally scheduled, the chat box will be staffed by the librarian originally assigned to the class during the time of the instruction session as it was originally scheduled. At other times (Mon-Thurs 11am-8pm and Sat/Sun 12-4pm) another librarian will be available to chat.

This is definitely a work in progress, and we will continue to make adjustments and improvements as we get a better sense of how students (and faculty!) engage with these materials. Please do let us know if there are changes we can make to better support English 110 instruction!

With all best wishes,
Leila.

—————————————————————-
Dr. Leila Walker
Emerging Technologies and Digital Scholarship Librarian
Queens College, CUNY
leila.walker@qc.cuny.edu

Schedule for Library Workshops in Fall 2019

As you create your English 110 syllabus for Fall 2019, use the Library Workshops Schedule to include your assigned workshop date and location into your course schedule. This is a change from how this has typically been managed but we expect that it will become standard practice going forward. This new approach will reduce the administrative workload that typically happens in the thick of the semester and also will allow instructors and librarians to know their workshop dates well in advance and plan accordingly. Therefore, we ask that you try your best to work with your assigned date. If you absolutely need to change your assignment, please contact Mary Santora at mary.santora@qc.cuny.edu or 718-997-3747. 

You will also see in the spreadsheet that librarians have not (yet) been assigned to sections. Rosenthal Library has recently hired a dedicated English 110 instruction team who will co-facilitate the majority of these classes — you will be informed of your assigned librarian in the first few weeks of the Fall semester. Furthermore, this team will work closely with the Library’s Instruction Coordinator (Digital Scholarship and Emerging Technologies Librarian, Dr. Leila Walker) and FYW to continue reviewing and revising the pedagogy of these workshops to make sure that they are student-centered, interactive, and memorable. Ideally, students’ introduction to the Library should not only inform them about the value of the library as a resource but also inspire them to continue using the library throughout their academic careers. If you have any ideas or sample lesson outlines for the 110 library workshop, email FYW (fyw@qc.cuny.edu). Our goal is to share model lesson plans and interactive classroom activities for the library workshop in the Fall.

Thanks for your continued hard work at QC. See you all in the Fall!

 

New Post!

About Posts

This is a Post. Instructors often post announcements, assignments, and discussion questions for for students to comment. Some instructors have students post assignments. Posts are listed on the “Posts” page with the newest at the top. 

Post Comments are turned on by default (see Home for information on Comments).

Add/Remove a password from this post from the Post Editor > Visibility > Edit > Password Protected.

Add/Edit/Delete a post from Dashboard > Posts